Esoteric Dissertations from a One-Track Mind

June 15, 2007

Noam Chomsky

Filed under: books, politics — codesmithy @ 7:37 am

I picked up “Failed States: The Abuse of Power and the Assault on Democracy” by Noam Chomsky. I don’t find the book as lucid as “The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic” by Chalmers Johnson.  But, it could be that I’ve spent reading the likes of Ayn Rand and Michael Pollan recently, so it just might be that I’m more used to a more conventional style.  However, I will be be the last person to accuse Mr. Chomsky of incorrect grammar, since his academic contributions in that arena are important and uncontroversial despite objections ones may have to his politics.  It may be this very fact that he feels the need to use [sic] in his quotations, lest he be accused incompetence in his area of expertise, which I have no doubt people have tried.  Possibly, it is simply intolerance of the ignorance of proper sentence structure.  Or maybe he is trying to cheaply discredit them.  I find [sic]’s interrupt my flow, and am left trying to find the area of grammatical complaint rather than digesting what was said.

It is also hard to read because he tries to expose the hypocrisy of government action, although he seems to take other quotations from government officials at face value.  I can’t tell if he is trying to be sarcastic.  Although, it is hard to fathom that to be the case, since anyone that has been exposed to the Internet should have learned that sarcasm does not work well in a written medium (queue the need for <sarcasm></sarcasm> tags).  Regardless, sarcasm is a horrible rhetorical device, since the perceived opposite of your point is left to interpretation rather than clarification.  So, for a few points he tries to make, I’m just left baffled, which is a shame since he seemed to take great effort to add end notes everywhere.

As for the content that I can discern, I agree with much of what he says.  I don’t know why the idea that the U.S. should submit itself to international law is treated as if it is such an inconceivable proposition.  The U.S. would benefit to be seen as one voice in many in a condemnation of a country, rather than acting through unilateral actions.  Dismantling some of our immense nuclear arsenal would add teeth to non-proliferation treaties.

America needs to be seen as a country that obeys the rule of law.  In that respect, there cannot be an American exception.  While, Noam Chomsky and I are in agreement on this viewpoint, I find it frustrating when there are U.N. actions such as the Iraqi embargo and Kosovo that he seems to lay entirely at the feet of the U.S.  I am not arguing with the fact that they were U.S. led, but rather there is no condemnation of the countries that went along with it.  We can blame Bush for starting the Iraq war, and the democrats for failing to set a timetable for withdraw in ending our involvement in it, but some blame has to be laid at the feet of the American people for reelecting Bush in 2004.

Another point of contention are Clinton’s interventions in Bosnia and Somalia.  These were complex situations, and even today, I don’t believe there are perfect answers.  Should we not get involved, or do we use our military and political might to try to bring peace instead of continuing genocide, suffering and bloodshed?  What obligation do we have as a free and moral people to stop another holocaust from occurring?  Not that the government has always conducted itself in this way, and certainly much of our history is tainted.   However, to condemn everything is equally reckless and unfair.  Is South Korea more prosperous than the North?  Are the French not grateful for our help in freeing them from Nazi rule?  Could Noam Chomsky write a book so critical of the government which he resides, if he happened to be China?  Would I be able to write this blog?  I make no conjectures on America’s total national karma since we are certainly in a deficit, in company with almost every other nation now or in history of the planet.  Could we do better?  Yes.  Must we do better?  Yes, if we want to survive to the 22nd century and beyond.  But, some credit must be given and some blame must be placed elsewhere, there is no such thing as an innocent bystander when the young pay for the transgressions of the old.

Advertisements

1 Comment »

  1. Either you are for democracy or you are not. Chomsky contributes mightily to the democratic cause (small d) in the USA. By definition , democracy calls for freedom of expression. If one does not question the government, we no longer have democracy.

    It is ironic that the Bush administration ,having exausted the rathionale for all its previous pretexts for invading Iraq now says that the reason we are in Iraq is to bring democracy to that country, while surpressing democracy here and going against the UN which is really a means of obtaining international democracy.

    To say that the UN is useless is to make a self-fulfilling prophasy. If Bush had allowed the UN to guide our actions vis-a-vis Iraq we would have been far better off. We need to nurture and support the UN and give up some of our preogatives for the greater good.

    The Project for the New American Century starts out by saying that the world would be better off with American leadership.

    THAT STATEMENT COULD ACTUALLY BE TRUE IF IT WERE THE RIGHT KIND OF LEADERSHIP. Certainly the world is not taking well to the US preemptive invasion of an oil rich arab country which had not attacked the USA and was no danger to the USA.

    Comment by gasdocpol — June 15, 2007 @ 9:55 am


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: