Esoteric Dissertations from a One-Track Mind

March 11, 2008

Spitzer Prosecution: Evidence for a Surveillance State?

Filed under: politics — Tags: , — codesmithy @ 8:08 am

Democratic Governor of New York, Eliot Spitzer got caught by a federal wiretap hiring a prostitute.  This has caused Glenn Greenwald to ask: “who cares if Eliot Spitzer hires prostitutes?”

Yes, Spitzer apparently broke the law.  I also believe public officials should be held to high standards.  But, one has to wonder if the fed was actually investigating a crime in this instance, or investigating a person.  These are the exact type of petty and shallow prosecutions with ulterior political motives that one worries about in a surveillance state.  The goal isn’t to make the society safer.  It is to distract the public and embarrass political opponents for political gains.  Vast resources are used to investigate and prosecute petty offenses and in the worst case blackmail officials.

These are the types of prosecutions you get when you give vast and unchecked spying powers to the state.  It isn’t to make us safe from terrorists.  It is to ensure those who are in power, stay in power.  The way they do so is having every piece of dirt you can possibly imagine on everybody, then selective enforce the law while touting the highest of ethical standards.  It should be no surprise that Spitzer is being prosecuted under the anachronistic Mann Act, an act with an infamous history including the prosecution of Jack Johnson.

Should Spitzer resign?  I don’t know.  I don’t really care.  He isn’t the governor of the state that I live in, so my opinion doesn’t count for much anyway.  However, this prosecution should give us some pause on how federal surveillance is actually being used.  It should also be obvious that the purpose of unchecked spying powers isn’t to legitimately track down terrorists.  It is to discover personally embarrassing crimes like this.  Such a wide dragnet is patently illegal, and precisely why the telecoms need immunity.

Advertisements

2 Comments »

  1. Your insight is keen into how prosecutions can be used to distract. In fact, deception and diversion are long known in the art of war as tactics to keep an opponent at bay. In this case, the opponent is the people, the citizenry. The only element lacking in your analysis is that Eliot Spitzer himself was a prosecutor, and in fact he was prosecuting more actively than anyone ever holding the office of New York Attorney General, and under many laws that had not been invoked for over 100 years. But now we know Spitzer had associates in organized crime, though so far the public is only aware of the Prostitution Ring. We need a special prosecutor appointed to examine all of Spitzer’s acts as a prosecutor. Spitzer held the extreme power to decide if or when an investigation or prosecution too k place. Such power translates directly into millions of dollars in the hands of a corrupt official. And now we know Eliot Spitzer was corrupt. We need a Special Prosecutor on Spitzer.

    Comment by Dr. C. — March 21, 2008 @ 11:04 pm

  2. […] Spitzer, yes that one, wrote an editorial in the Washington Post that directly links the Bush Administration to predatory […]

    Pingback by The Credit Crisis: Too Big To Fail « Esoteric Dissertations from a One-Track Mind — March 25, 2008 @ 8:17 am


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: