Youtube has an interview with Noam Chomsky pertaining to government. Chomsky is an anarcho-syndicalist, or the libertarian left.
If the words don’t make sense, it proves the effectiveness of filters in our society. For example, Leon Frank Czolgosz, an anarchist, shot President McKinley. Although, calling Czolgosz an anarchist is a little bit of a stretch. It isn’t like one has to take a test or get a degree from an accredited institution. In fact, the primary schism in the two branches of socialism, communism/Marxism on one-side and anarcho-syndicalism on the other, is the use of violence in bringing about social revolution. Anarcho-syndicalism, in the Proudhon tradition, believes social revolution can take place peacefully. Social revolution is a matter of raising consciousness of the populace to a new way of living. Communism, in the Marxist tradition, advocated the violent overthrow of the existing regime. When in power, the new regime would have the power to dictatorially carry out social reforms.
The underlying point is that there is a great diversity of thought about the organization of society that is far to the left of the Democratic party. It is common, in the United States at least, to label this “liberal.” It is hard to determine what “liberal” means besides a label that the right uses to adorn some political opponent as a target of scorn.
There is a fundamental difference between a thing, and what that thing is called. I hope what this alphabet soup of “isms” convinces the reader of, more than anything else, is to know the idea and not just the label. As Friedrich Engels once wrote:
These gentlemen think that when they have changed the names of things they have changed the things themselves. This is how these profound thinkers mock at the whole world.